Post by joita973 on Feb 12, 2024 2:52:41 GMT -6
The violation of the provisions of the procedure which had a significant impact on the outcome of the case i.e. art. sentence ppsa. by failing to properly explain the legal basis for the Courts decision and preparing the justification for the contested judgment in a manner that violates the rules of persuasion art. ppsa in connection with Art. of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland in connection with Art. point ppsa and art. of the Act of July Law on the System of Administrative Courts Journal of Laws No. item as amended hereinafter referred to as pusa by failing to apply it and as a result upholding the judgment of the Director of the Chamber.
Tax Office which sanctioned the actions of the tax inspection body undertaken in violation of Cape Verde Email List the law i.e. Art. section of the VAT Act by applying the provisions of Art. Ab of the th Directive and Art. VI Directive art. point letter c ppsa in connection with art. art. point ppsa and art. art. PUSA by failing to find any violations of law and the Courts refusal to annul the contested decision in a situation where the contested decision was issued with violations of the provisions of Art. art. and art. of the Act of August Tax Ordinance Journal of Laws of No.
Item as amended hereinafter referred to as the Tax Ordinance by establishing factual circumstances that are inconsistent with the principles of conducting explanatory proceedings. . In the justification for the cassation appeal the party justified all of the abovementioned allegations. She particularly emphasized that the insurance service is a separate service from the leasing service. The insurance service is not an element necessary to provide the leasing service and the provision of leasing and insurance services by any new uniform and comprehensive service. It is possible to provide a leasing service without providing an insurance service.